An International Journal House

Einstein International Journal Organization(EIJO)

Connecting People With Genius Thought

Einstein International Journal Organization(EIJO) is an international Genius Thought journals platform .
JOURNALS || EIJO Journal of Science, Technology and Innovative Research (EIJO – JSTIR) [ ISSN : 2455 - 9938 ]
Fixed functional appliances - A general review

Author Names : 1Dr. Rajdeep Kaur, 2Dr. Anil Prasher, 3Dr. Sukhpal Kaur,4Dr. Gurpreet Kaur  Volume 7 Issue 4
Article Overview

Abstract

Functional appliances have been used since the 1930s. Despite this relatively long history, there continues to be much confusion relating to their use, method of appliances alters the arrangement of various muscle groups that influence the function and position of the mandible in order to transmit forces to the dentition and the basal bone. Typically, these muscular forces are generating orthodontic and orthopedic changes. Functional appliances have been broadly divided into two categories removable and fixed functional appliances. Fixed functional appliances have patients who are non-compliant to removable appliances and in patients after the active growth phase has been completed. Treatment of class II malocclusion has always been an enigma to the orthodontic fraternity. Noncompliant correction of class II malocclusion using fixed functional appliances at the deceleration stage of growth has gained tremendous popularity in the recent times. Aim of the illustrated article is to demonstrate the efficacy of a fixed functional appliance in correction of class II malocclusion. The purpose of this review was to overview the different fixed functional appliances available till date for the treatment.

Keywords: Functional Appliances, MPA, MARA.

Reference
  1. GRABER T.M., Rakosi T., Petrovic Alexandre G. Dentofacial orthopedics with functional appliance.2thEdn. Mosby Ltd. 2009.
  2. Olivier R.G., Knapp man J.M. Attitudes to orthodontic treatment. British Journal of Orthodontics 1985; 12:179-88.
  3. Moschos A. Papadopoulos, Orthodontic Treatment of the Class II Noncompliant Patient pgno.7-9 published in2006.
  4. HERBST E. Atlas und Grundriss der Zahnärztlichen Orthopedic. Munich, Germany, J.F. Lehmann Verlag, 1910.
  5. PANCHERZ H. Treatment of Class II malocclusions by jumping the bite with the Herbst appliance. A cephalometric investigation. Am. J. Orthod. 1979; 76: 423-442.
  6. RittoA.korrodi2001fixed functional appliance-a classification. Orthodontic cyberjournal., June
  7. Ritto A.K. Tratman to das Classes II division 1 com a Biela Magnetic. Tese dissert. 1997.
  8. Filho C.M. Mandibular Protraction Appliances for Class II Treatment. J. Clin. Orthod. 1995; 29: 319 – 336.
  9. Filho C.M. Clinical Applications of the Mandibular Protraction Appliance. J. Clin. Orthod. 1997; 31: 92 – 102.
  10. Filho C.M. The Mandibular Protraction Appliance III. J. Clin. Orthod. 1998; 32: 379-384.