An International Journal House
Einstein International Journal Organization(EIJO)
Connecting People With Genius Thought
JOURNALS || EIJO Journal of Engineering, Technology and Innovative Research (EIJO – JETIR) [ ISSN : 2455 - 9172 ]
Privacy Violation in Online Social Network Using Agent Based Architecture
Author Names : Grishma R. Pardeshi,Rajesh H. Kulkarni
Volume 2 Issue 3
Abstract
In online social networks (OSNs), users are permit to create and Post content and information about themselves and others. When many entities start distributing content, information can get unrelated individuals and inference can show more Information about the user. Existing applications do not focus on detecting privacy violations before they occur in the system. This paper state that agent-based representation of a social network in this agents manage users privacy related requirements and create privacy agreements with agents at time of entering. The privacy content, such as the relationship between users, many related information in the system. Here argue that commonsense reasoning could be useful to solve some of privacy examples reported in the literature. It is ?rst reviewed to ?nd out the Privacy violation. However, in online social networks, privacy violates are not necessarily a malfunctioning of a user’s system but a byproduct of its workings. The users are allowed to create and share content or pictures about themselves and others. When multiple entities start interpreting content without a control, information can reach unrelated individuals and inference can reveal more information about the user private data. Accordingly, this paper ?rst look to the privacy violations that take place in online social networks.
Keywords: Social Network, Privacy Violation, Agent-based representation, Violation Detection.
[1]. N. Kokciyan and P. Yolum. Commitment-based privacy management in online social networks. In First International Workshop on Multiagent Foundations of Social Computing at AAMAS, 2014.
[2]. J. Mc Carthy. Arti?cial intelligence, logic and formalizing common sense. InPhilosophicalLogicandArti?cialIntelligence,pages161190.Springer, 1989.
[3]. M. P. Singh. An ontology for commitments in multiagent systems. Arti?cial Intelligence and Law, 7(1):97113
[4]. M. Bennicke and P. Langendorfer. Towards automatic negotiation of privacy contracts for internet services. In Networks, 2003. ICON2003. The 11th IEEE International Conference on, pages 319324. IEEE, 2003.
[5]. M. Horridge and S. Bechhofer. The OWL API: A Java API for OWL ontologies. Semantic Web, 2(1):1121, 2011.
[6]. M. X. Zhou, J. Nichols, T. Dignan, S. Lohr, J. Golbeck, and J. W.Pennebaker, Opportunities and risks of discovering personality traits from social media, in Proc. of the extended abstracts of ACM conference on Human factors in computing systems. ACM, 2014, pp. 10811086
[7]. J. Golbeck and D. Hansen, A method for computing political preference among twitter followers, Social Networks, vol. 36, pp. 177184, 2014.
[8]. R. Heatherly, M. Kantarcioglu, and B. Thuraisingham, Preventing private information inference attacks on social networks, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., vol. 25, no. 8, pp. 18491862, 2013.
[9]. C. G. Akcora, B. Carminati, and E. Ferrari, Risks of friendships on social networks, in IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), 2012, pp. 810815.
[10]. K. Liu and E. Terzi, A framework for computing the privacy scores of users in online social networks, ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery from Data (TKDD), vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 6:16:30, 2010